Strengthen science citizenship – CASC policy recommendations

Voting on policy recommendations

The group discussing the topic ‘Strengthen science citizenship’ selected four policy recommendations to promote and be included in the Conference Report . These were:

  • Promote science through partnerships between scientists and coporations
  • Invest in science educators and communicators
  • Develop a cohesive fiscal framework across the EU to support/enhance science
  • Strengthen links between science professionals and the media

DSC_0678DSC_0679

Some more detail around these recommendations were added to posters. Here are some of the suggestions:

Promote science through partnerships between scientists and corporations

  • Design labs so that scientists can meet the public
  • Excursions to factories
  • Long-term project between scientists, politicians, companies, schools, science centres
  • Project-based learning (real life)
  • Regulate the responsibility of the media

Invest in science educators and communicators

  • Make it compulsory to allocate x% of scientific research budgets to invest in communicators and educators
  • Complimentary science courses for teachers

Develop a cohesive fiscal framework across the EU to support/enhance science

  • Recognise challenges of science communication in remote/rural areas of Europe
  • Align structural funding mechanisms
  • Better target existing mechanisms
  • Increase proportion of income tax used to support scince

Strengthen links between science professionals and the media

  • Organise training for journalists and scientists together
  • General debates on science issues
  • Film festivals
  • Involve scriptwriters with scientists
  • Create tools to infuse science in mainstream culture

The initial list of policy recommendations discussed by the group included:

  • Hold referenda on certain (controversial?) science themes to increase interest (already happens in some countries?)
  • Ensure science is approached from an issue- or project-base rather than subject-based to ensure inter-disciplinary
  • Strengthen links between science professionals and the media (table two agree with this)
  • Promote adult informal but structured education and engagement
  • Ensure balanced science standpoints are made available to society, for example through supporting NGOs?
  • Encourage production of fiction (novels, movies, tv) about controversial science issues
  • Invest in scientists as communicators or in science communicators (or both)
  • Organise open citizens debate between scientists and media
  • Essential for EU to have specific science and society program
  • Improve the professional status for teachers
  • Educate teachers in science
  • Redirect a proportion of personal tax, through local budget to finance science dissemination projects
  • Means tested free computer and internet access in primary schools in rural areas
  • Work closely with scientists
  • Tax exemption for companies financing science dissemination projects (eg. science bus to different village).
  • Better educate teachers
  • Work closely with scientists and the business world
  • Strengthen scientific education through CSR initiatives
  • Science promoters – phd students to have compulsory hours to to disseminate science to hard to reach groups/schools
  • Design labs in a style that allows science dissemination (i.e glass labs where people can see how scientists work and allows visits from schools etc)
This entry was posted in Final Conference, Innovative ways of engaging people in science, Public and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *